RELATIONS AND FUNCTIONS CLASS 11 QUESTIONS

Question 1 :

On the set of natural numbers let R be the relation defined by aRb if 2a + 3b = 30. Write down the relation by listing all the pairs. Check whether it is

(i) reflexive (ii) symmetric (iii) transitive (iv) equivalence

Solution :

2a + 3b = 30

3b  =  30 - 2a 

b  =  (30 - 2a)/3  ==>  10 - (2a/3)

If a = 3

b = 10 - 2 = 8 

(3, 8)

If a = 6

b = 10 - 4 = 6 

(6, 6)

If a = 9

b = 10 - 6 = 4 

(9, 4)

If a = 12

b = 10 - 8 = 2 

(12, 2)

If a = 15

b = 10 - 10 = 0

0 is not natural number 

R = {(3, 8) (6, 6) (9, 4) (12, 2)}

(i) reflexive

The relation R is not reflexive, because it does not have the element (3, 3).

(ii) symmetric

The relation R has (3, 8) but (8, 3) is not in the set. Hence R is not symmetric

(iii)  Transitive :

R is said to be transitive, if “a is related to b and b is related to c” implies that a is related to c

We cannot take pair from the given relation to prove that it is not transitive. Hence it is transitive.

It is not equivalence relation.

Let us look into the next example on "Relations and Functions Class 11 Questions".

Question 2 :

Prove that the relation “friendship” is not an equivalence relation on the set of all people in Chennai.

Solution :

Let A be the the set of all people in Chennai.

Reflexive :

a is not a friend of a. It is not reflexive.

Symmetric :

If a is a friend of b, then b is also a friend of a. Hence it is symmetric.

Transitive :

a is a friend of b, b is a friend of c, which implies that a be a friend of c or may not not be a friend of c. Hence it is not transitive.

So it is not equivalence relation.

Question 3 :

On the set of natural numbers let R be the relation defined by aRb if a + b ≤ 6. Write down the relation by listing all the pairs. Check whether it is

(i) reflexive (ii) symmetric (iii) transitive (iv) equivalence

Solution :

The sum of a and b will be lesser than or equal to 6, based on this condition let us list out the elements 

R = {(1, 1) (1, 2) (1, 3) (1, 4) (1, 5) (2, 1) (2, 2) (2, 3) (2, 4) (3, 1) (3, 2) (3, 3) (4, 1) (4, 2) (5, 1)}

(i) reflexive

In the relation,  we have (1, 1) (2, 2) and (3, 3) but we do not have (4, 4) and (5, 5). Hence it is not reflexive.

(ii) symmetric

The relation has the elements (1, 2) and (2, 1), (1, 3) and (3, 1), (1, 4) and (4, 1), (1, 5) and (5, 1). 

(iii) Transitive

The relation has the elements (5, 1) and (1, 5), but it do not have the element (5, 5). Hence it is not transitive.

Hence it is not equivalence relation.

Question 4 :

Let A = {a, b, c}. What is the equivalence relation of smallest cardinality on A? What is the equivalence relation of largest cardinality on A?

Solution :

Let R be the relation 

R = {(a, a)( b, b)(c, c)}

largest cardinality on A  =   A x A

Question 5 :

In the set Z of integers, define mRn if m − n is divisible by 7. Prove that R is an equivalence relation.

Solution :

(i) reflexive

m is related to m, then m - m = 0 which is divisible by 7. Hence it is reflexive.

(ii) symmetric

If m is related to n, then m - n is divisible by 7

If n - m is divisible by 7, then n is related to m. 

Hence it is symmetric.

(iii) Transitive

m R n, then m - n  =  7k  --(1)

n R p, then n - p  =  7t --(2)

k and t are some constants. 

(1) - (2)

m - n + n - p  =  7k + 7t

 m - p  = 7 (k + t)

Then m is related to p. It is transitive.

Hence Z is equivalence relation.

Apart from the stuff given above, if you need any other stuff in math, please use our google custom search here.

Kindly mail your feedback to v4formath@gmail.com

We always appreciate your feedback.

©All rights reserved. onlinemath4all.com

Recent Articles

  1. Factoring Quadratic Trinomials

    Apr 26, 24 01:51 AM

    Factoring Quadratic Trinomials - Key Concepts - Solved Problems

    Read More

  2. Factoring Trinomials Worksheet

    Apr 25, 24 08:40 PM

    tutoring.png
    Factoring Trinomials Worksheet

    Read More

  3. Factoring Quadratic Trinomials Worksheet

    Apr 25, 24 08:13 PM

    tutoring.png
    Factoring Quadratic Trinomials Worksheet

    Read More